Saturday, May 21, 2011

Lacoste Perfume Ads

Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • dguisinger
    Aug 7, 07:58 AM
    Well all those measure are bogus. OS X is far more secure than you can get from that Windows crap.

    Thats why Leopard is Vista Reloaded, ver 2.0
    :)

    Eh, but you still have to find the stuff and set it up. In XPSP2 all security related settings are in one place, its nice. And the OS keeps annoying the hell out of you if you dont turn the firewall on.....

    OOH, and even better....this one I like:
    XP SP2, with firewall enabled, will tell you when a application is attempting to make a network connection, ask for authorization (allow once, allow always, or never), and adjust your firewall settings. If you are playing a game, no more swearing, the OS tells you whats wrong and asks if you trust the application. Good for the clueless people (or, good for those damn games that dont document their TCP/UDP ports)





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • peeInMyPantz
    Aug 7, 12:51 AM
    10am PST is 1am here. So it's really like christmas. So should I keep myself awake and take a peep at santa? or just wait for the good news tomorrow. Or bad news.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 10, 03:10 PM
    Harley-Davidson doesn't make automatics. I never learned to drive automatic anyhow, I wouldn't have the first clue what to do in one of them. What does P R N D 2 1 even mean ?





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • ~Shard~
    Sep 6, 09:01 AM
    Maybe i am alone on this one....

    I think the 24" iMac G5 is the beginning of the end of the G5 iMac.

    You are alone on this one - the end of the G5 iMac has already happened, in fact it happened a long time ago when Apple introduced the first Intel iMacs. Hate to break it to ya, but G5 iMacs haven't been around for a long time, nor does a 24" G5 iMac even exist. :p :cool:

    As for this new incarnation of the Intel iMac though, it totally depends on Apple's strategy. If they want to leave it as a desktop computer, yeah, it probably doesn't make sense to get much bigger. However, if they want to eventually incorporate a TV tuner and make it even more media-centric, and have it evolve into something else, then this may just be the beginning, not the end. :cool:





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • GregA
    Aug 24, 09:41 PM
    I suspect we'll see slight case redesigns for Santa Rosa-based Macs. Santa Rosa will be the real Core 2 platform. This year's Meroms are a stopgap.Isn't everything a stop gap, in that sense? Just with sweet spots along the way :)

    as well as include new WiFi and the "Robson" flash technology for fast-booting.I'll have to look up Robson... I imagine Boot Camp will work quite well if it only takes 10 seconds to switch from an active Mac to an active Windows machine...





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • Brianstorm91
    Jan 11, 04:54 PM
    But the current MacBook is 13.3" and not a Pro model :confused:

    I call fake.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • JosiahPB
    Jul 18, 08:24 AM
    Unless paying for movies with a 320x240 resolution with stereo sound is your thing....





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • Schizoid
    Apr 21, 11:33 AM
    Is Al Frankin running for president again? :rolleyes:


    no, all politicians wave the "privacy" banner... they don't want their employers (i.e. you and me) to know where they've been.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • lordonuthin
    Dec 23, 06:03 PM
    New work units are on the way (http://folding.typepad.com/)

    Just have to wait to see what the ppd will be.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • spicyapple
    Nov 28, 09:50 AM
    Ouch. Third time's the charm for Microsoft, though, which would put their Zune mini iPod killer for a 2009 release date. By then, we'd all have iPod sub-cutaneous implants.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • mrgreen4242
    Sep 6, 10:35 AM
    Please explain to me who would buy a mini and why?
    I just don't get it when a imac is close in price with a monitor.
    What am I missing?

    I love my mini. I would have bought the former top end mini (1.66ghz Duo, 80gb HDD, SD) to replace my mini if it came down to $599 refurb/$699 new. I like my monitor just fine. I prefer the form factor of the mini over the iMac is what it comes down to, I suppose.

    I'm not a fan of the iMac design... mostly because of my bad experience with a Rev A iMac G5 being so freaking loud. If Apple had kept the Core Solo and dropped it's price $100 or more (Apple needs a $399 mini more than it needs a $799 model) lots of people would have bought it.

    As it stands, though, the mini kinda sucks.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • iMark
    Feb 23, 08:07 AM
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5048/5279232275_ca2cf1fddb_b.jpg

    Photo details on flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmmarkus/5279232275/in/photostream/)





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 27, 10:06 AM
    Again, context is the difference. One wouldn't be in violation of the trademark if presenting it in general terms (outside of the field or in reference to something w/in the field, much like Windows OS vs. GUI windows),

    I think we're saying the same things, but perhaps my original post wasn't specific enough in verbiage....

    The bold part is wrong. In the field of reference, you can't use the trademark even if you're using it generically or descriptively if it has been granted. You will get sued and maybe even lose if the mark is not rescinded. You can even get sued preemptively as is the case here (Amazon appstore).

    Windows OS vs GUI windows is not the same field. One is an Operating System, the other is a GUI element of different computer systems. Microsoft never sued MIT over the X Window System because that's not an OS. They did sue the guys behind the Lindows OS though.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • SciFrog
    Jan 23, 08:42 AM
    Our PPD has dropped 20%from the peak, I lost a big unit this week...

    Can't wait for Gulftown and GPU3...





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • abhimat.gautam
    Mar 31, 03:00 AM
    Apple has never mentioned before the new "Scene Kit":

    Introduced in Mac OS X v10.7, the Scene Kit framework enables your application to import, manipulate, and render three-dimensional assets. It supports 3D assets imported via COLLADA, an XML-based schema that facilitates the transport of 3D assets between applications. Architecturally, a scene is composed of the 3D entities of cameras, lights, and meshes. Scene Kit lets you access attributes of scene objects�for example, geometry, bounding volume, and material�and is consistent with the APIs of other graphical frameworks, such as Core Animation and Image Kit.

    Scene Kit is intended for developers who quickly need to integrate 3D rendering into their applications. It doesn�t require that you have advanced graphical programming skills.

    Nice, didn�t know about that.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • emotion
    Aug 29, 09:29 AM
    The Mac Mini is going to use the 5000 series Meroms and the iMac is going to use the 7000s.

    I bet this is the case too. 2MB cache instead of the higher end 4MB cache in the 7000s.

    I find it hard to believe they will stick with Yonahs.

    I'd also like to see a drop in price, so I guess if they do stick with Yonah then a drop might happen.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • LethalWolfe
    Apr 5, 01:57 PM
    What are you talking about? iTMS not generating profit? Geez, check your facts!



    You are the one in need of fact checking. Jobs has said in a number of interviews that iTMS will generate enough money to basically break even. iTMS is there to sell iPods, not to make a profit.


    Lethal





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • EagerDragon
    Nov 28, 11:42 AM
    Creating a low end monitor would be a very, very wise decision on Apple's part. Buyers of Mac Minis would appreciate having a less expensive Apple monitor to go with their stuff.

    I disagree, take the price of a mini, add a good 17" monitor (4:3 (but not a super cheap one)) then compare the price to the 17" iMac. Not much difference and the iMac has better everything.





    Lacoste Perfume Ads. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • xUKHCx
    Jan 11, 04:55 PM
    Leads nicely on from "There's Something in the Air" (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=412600).

    If you ask me it is not a very good name.





    Lollypop
    Aug 16, 07:50 AM
    I wish whoever posted this would get it straight - Microsoft is coming out with zune to compete with iPod. They are the one with the new product that will inevitably suck.

    I don't understand why this post says that Apple is coming out with wireless capabilities to compete with zune - if nobody has wireless out yet, then there is not much a competition. And it certainly isn't Apple hoping to be the ones to catch up.

    The post says apple is going to compete with Zune because everyone knows almost everything about zune, with the exception of having a physical zune apple can at least stay on top by brining in inovative features before zune has them.





    aafuss1
    Aug 6, 10:16 PM
    I predict next year's iWork '07-hasta la vista MS Works (it can use .doc). Apple should add Office XML spport in '07.
    Tiger-start your photocopiers, Redmond

    The Vista stab-good one.





    IbisDoc
    Mar 25, 05:50 PM
    Most of the naysayers believe that tilting and touch-screen gaming is for sissies. They want actual analog controllers and such. They'll never change that attitude because they what they were raised on. The younger, current group of gamers will find that tilt & touch is very natural for them so they won't be as prone to griping that the past is slowly fading away.

    I like racing games a lot and this one looks terrific. Apple needs to build a game console with two iPad2 chips in it or one quad-core ARM processor. That would make one fine low-cost system with more games than you could possibly want available. Apple would just have to work out some touch & tilt controllers for it.

    Touchscreen gaming requires you to LOOK AT THE TOUCHSCREEN. This works if the game is ON THE TOUCHSCREEN (for example, the iPad). This doesn't work if the game is on a different screen (for example, the TV). In touchscreen gaming, the concept is that you are watching the action on the screen that you are touching, not on a different screen 6-8 feet away.

    In what way is that a dinosaur concept?

    This will have limited usefulness, mainly tilting games. Or maybe a dumb game where you just need to smack the screen to whack a mole or something.





    shawnce
    Nov 15, 07:40 PM
    Just asking a question, understand. But, is there a need to have more memory as twice as many requesting sources are accessing the memory pool?

    No. The number of core in the system does not imply you need more memory however it does imply you may need more memory bandwidth (depends on what you plan to use the cores for).

    Running many applications, especially memory hungry ones, concurrently is what could require additional memory to run efficiently (depends on working set of the applications you plan to run).

    With that said ... to get the most memory bandwidth potential in a Mac Pro you need fully populate peer banks with DIMMs. For example in the following graphic you would want to populate slots A1, A2, B1 and B2 before any other slots to get the widest data path to memory.

    http://developer.apple.com/documentation/HardwareDrivers/Conceptual/HWTech_RAM/Art/060634001312_05.jpg

    For more details on Mac Pro memory review Mac Pro RAM Expansion Details (http://developer.apple.com/documentation/HardwareDrivers/Conceptual/HWTech_RAM/Articles/RAM_implementation.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40003899-DontLinkElementID_3) or the simpler to read Mac Pro Memory Guide (pdf) (http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/MacPro_MemoryDIMM_DIY.pdf)





    DStaal
    Sep 7, 11:34 AM
    On the rental vs. purchase argument...

    I'm not going to touch which one is 'better' for videos at the moment. I have opinions, but nevermind.

    Let's work on the technolocial aspects for a moment, shall we?

    Rental requires working DRM. Period. Absolutely. Otherwise there is no way for it to be just rental: you have the file, you can watch it whenever.

    Purchase doesn't. You get the file, you can use forever, because you own it.

    There is no unbreakable DRM scheme. It doesn't exist today, it probably never will. This is because you, the consumer, are required to be able to decrypt the files sometimes but not others. Which means you have all the info needed to decrypt it. Which means, sooner or later, that someone will figure out how to access that info when they want to, not when the software wants to.

    So, Apple requiring a purchase model is just recognizing the limitations of the technology. They have nothing they can 'take back' at the end of a rental period, and it is no cheaper (it's actually more expensive) for them to rent something to you.

    There is an apparent temporary advantage to the rental model to the movie studios, since they can charge you multiple times for the same movie. It costs Apple just as much to 'rent' you a movie or sell it to you, so Apple has no advantage, and you get the same file either way.

    If you don't want to keep it, just throw it out. Same difference. The rest is pricing games.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment